Matthews tries to trash the National Guard
Via Newsbusters, Chris Matthews had retired Marine Corps Major General Arnold Punaro, Chairman of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves on his show, and attempted to make the case that the U.S. didn’t have enough forces for any kind of “surge” in Iraq. He also attempted to downplay the abilities of the National Guard and Reserve.
Nice try, Chris, but this general wasn’t about to play ball. Some excerpts, via Newsbusters:
Matthews, archly: “Do we have the troops to dramatically increase our complement of troops in Iraq, sir?”
Punaro: “Absolutely. Between our active military and the number of troops we have in the Guard and Reserve, should the Commander-in-Chief, on the advice of the combatant commanders in the field and with the concurrence of the Congress make the decision that we want to increase the size of the force in Iraq, we certainly have the ability to surge those forces.”
Whoops! Matthews tried a tactical retreat, thinking he might achieve his goal by denigrating the abilities of the non-active military: “What about the National Guard people and the Reservists, are they the kind of people it’s appropriate to send into house-to-house combat in the middle of that huge city of Baghdad, where they’ll be getting shot at every moment and where they’ll be killing Arabs. Is that the right place for them?”
Again, the Major General wouldn’t sing Matthews’s song: “First of all, over 550,000 Guard and Reserve personnel have been mobilized since 9-11. Many of them have served extensive tours in Iraq and Aghanistan. They’ve been side-by-side with their active components. They’ve been in the thick of the combat. The Marine Corps and Army ground forces are trained the same as their active duty counterparts. They’re every bit as capable of closing with and destroying the enemy as their active counterparts.”
Matthews gave it one last try: “And you believe that’s an appropriate use of Guardspeople to put them into house-to-house like we’re talking about? We’re talking about going in and cleaning out Baghdad, something that the Iraqi forces haven’t been able to do, that the 17,000 regular Army and Marine forces haven’t been able to do. You’re saying throw in the National Guard to do it?”
Punaro: “Well the question you first asked was are they capable of carrying out those kind of missions, and the answer is ‘yes’.”
Before any of you out there throw in your own negative commentary about the Guard and Reserves, consider this - in my own small National Guard unit of 22 people, fully 1/2 are combat veterans (some with multiple tours). Two are Special Forces qualified. Three more are Ranger qualified. Two are leaving soon to fight in Afghanistan - and this from a unit that remains, by law, stateside!
Of the brigade I just transfered out of, fully 1/3 have been deployed to somewhere in the Middle East over the last three years. Another 1/3 are about to be deployed to Afghanistan.
Are the National Guard and Reserves fully engaged in this fight? Damn straight! And I wouldn’t have it any other way.
Category :
Uncategorized 
Tags :
Similar Posts:
- An excellent read
- Back to Iraq
- 3 Doors Down pays tribute to America’s citizen soldiers
- First post!
- Iraq War deserter to be sent back from Canada
- Army to pay Captains $20,000 to stay on
- At Bliss
- Liberal web site spins troop survey against them
- Hillary in the White House during blue dress incident?
- Your tour in Iraq just got longer
Leave a Reply